Harvard Law School is grappling with allegations of systemic discrimination against White men within its Law Review, alongside charges of evidence destruction related to these claims. The U.S. Department of Justice disclosed that it has a cooperating witness within the publication, raising significant concerns about the integrity of the investigation. FASORP's accusations emphasize a pattern of racial discrimination in acceptance and publication processes, a claim that Harvard Law Review contradicts, asserting that it strictly adheres to rules prohibiting racial considerations in these practices. This controversy unfolds against the backdrop of Harvard's recent legal battles regarding its historical ties to slavery.
The allegations against Harvard Law Review include claims of discrimination against white men and accusations of evidence destruction during an active investigation by the Justice Department.
The department disclosed it had a 'cooperating witness' working inside the student-run journal, complicating the situation and raising further concerns about the integrity of the Law Review.
Controversial accusations from FASORP suggest that the Law Review uses race in its acceptance and publication processes, which Harvard vehemently denies, stating that race is not a factor.
After years of legal battles over its historical ties to slavery, Harvard's law school now faces scrutiny regarding its own internal policies on race and discrimination.
Collection
[
|
...
]