Although the Law Review considered sex, race, gender identity, or sexual orientation before the Supreme Court's decision in SFFA, nothing about this practice was unlawful... Accordingly, the Law Review's lawful practices of the past do not and cannot give rise to a plausible inference of discrimination today, Broderick wrote in his opinion.
A couple changes in language won't be enough to stop the Millers out there from filing proxy suits.
Collection
[
|
...
]