Some Ben Roberts-Smith allegations were heard in his defamation trial. How would a criminal case be different?
Briefly

Some Ben Roberts-Smith allegations were heard in his defamation trial. How would a criminal case be different?
"The criminal case will be decided on a higher burden of proof: beyond reasonable doubt. Rather than media organisations trying to defend their reporting, the case will focus on the commonwealth director of public prosecutions seeking to prove Roberts-Smith committed the criminal offences he has been charged with beyond reasonable doubt."
"Roberts-Smith is alleged to have intentionally caused the death of a person on or about 12 April 2009 at Kakarak and, with another person, on or about 20 October 2012 in Syahchow."
"The criminal case is set to focus on a narrower set of allegations than those traversed during the defamation proceedings: that Roberts-Smith either killed or was involved in the killing of five people during separate incidents in Kakarak, Syahchow and Darwan."
Ben Roberts-Smith, a Victoria Cross recipient, lost a defamation case against several media outlets over allegations of murder during his service in Afghanistan. He denied all wrongdoing. The upcoming criminal case will have a higher burden of proof, requiring the prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case will focus on specific incidents where Roberts-Smith is alleged to have killed or been involved in the killing of five individuals in Afghanistan, with charges stemming from events in Kakarak, Syahchow, and Darwan.
Read at www.theguardian.com
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]