The defense argues that the court's involvement could be tainted by political bias, suggesting that Judge Lewis Liman's confirmation involved more Democratic votes than Republican. The implication is that the judge may unconsciously lean towards the political ideologies aligned with the Plaintiff's counsel, which includes connections to Hunter Biden and liberal democracy organizations. These elements create a backdrop that could affect impartiality in handling Giuliani's case.
The defense raises concerns over the political affiliations of the Plaintiffs' counsel, highlighting their partnership with Hunter Biden's law firm and associations with politically charged organizations like United to Protect Democracy. The statement suggests that this context could harm the fairness of the legal proceedings, given Giuliani's opposing political beliefs and the charged atmosphere surging from the 2020 Presidential Campaign that these affiliations could invoke.
Collection
[
|
...
]