"I understand that in today's day and time, individuals may play fast and loose with the facts, but we don't do that in this courtroom." Judge R. Stan Baker's remarks underline the importance of truth and integrity within the judicial process, emphasizing that the court has a zero-tolerance approach for misleading information presented by lawyers.
"Plaintiffs counsel missed that mark in this case." This statement reflects the judge's discontent with the RNC's legal arguments, indicating that they failed to meet the court's expectations for presenting valid and truthful claims.
"Fulton County Superior Court Judge Kevin Farmer already dropkicked it last week, lecturing Kaufman that he was confusing advanced voting with absentee voting." The commentary highlights the ongoing judicial criticism toward the RNC’s legal strategies, showcasing a misunderstanding of fundamental electoral processes by the party’s representatives.
"Slightly different ballot access between counties has never been deemed to violate Equal Protection." This point stresses the legal precedent regarding voting access, suggesting that the claims made by the RNC regarding Equal Protection were unfounded and lacked supported evidence.
Collection
[
|
...
]