Opposing counsel's lack of communication led to a motion to compel lunch to resolve meet and confer issues, showing the court's flexibility in addressing procedural obstacles.
The court justified the lunch motion based on inherent powers, noting the routine granting of such motions without strong precedential support.
The motion, though unconventional, was seen by the court as having merit and is likely to be granted, indicating its effectiveness in encouraging cooperation.
[
add
]
[
|
|
...
]