"* Meta survives social media antitrust action because TikTok exists. Which it doesn't legally, but the administration has refused to comply with the law so... good news for Meta. [ New York Times] * Court orders former couple to bid for custody of dog. If that doesn't work, she should try threatening to cut it in half. [ ABA Journal] * Trump administration targets whistleblower protections. [ Reuters]"
"* Pillsbury Winthrop hit with data breach. [ Law360] * The argument against releasing the Epstein Files lays out why grand jury materials are normally kept secret. [ Vox] * How might Ashurst and Perkins Coie merger impact Asia? [ Law.com International]"
Meta survived a social media antitrust action because officials treated TikTok as an operational competitor despite its contested legal status, and regulators refused to enforce the relevant law, producing a favorable result for Meta. A court ordered a former couple to submit competitive bids for custody of their dog, with commentary suggesting extreme threats as a tactic. The Trump administration moved to curtail whistleblower protections. Pillsbury Winthrop experienced a data breach affecting client information. Arguments against releasing the Epstein Files emphasize reasons for maintaining grand jury secrecy. A proposed Ashurst and Perkins Coie merger could reshape legal practice and competition across Asia.
Read at Above the Law
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]