KPMG has indicated that the competition between Big Four firms and traditional American law firms is only beginning, suggesting a shift in the landscape of legal services. Meanwhile, a judge has raised concerns regarding the DOJ's explanations for the dismissal of the Adams case. Additionally, the perception of serial lateral moves in law has shifted, as they are no longer seen as detrimental to a lawyer's career. In a separate discussion, Musk's lawyers are attempting to revise Delaware law to facilitate a drastic compensation proposal that could allow him to claim a significant portion of company assets.
KPMG suggests that the ongoing trend of Big Four firms encroaching on U.S. legal markets, particularly in handling law firm work, is just beginning to unfold.
In a recent case, a judge criticized the DOJ for its handling of an Adams dismissal, pointing out that the agency has significant explanations to provide regarding its actions.
Recent analyses suggest that frequent lateral moves among lawyers are no longer viewed as significant deterrents in the legal profession, marking a cultural shift in perception.
Musk's legal team is pushing to amend Delaware law in a bid to allow his controversial pay proposal, which could see him appropriating almost half of the company's assets as personal compensation.
Collection
[
|
...
]