Legalytics Deep Dive #2: The Changing Face of Supreme Court Oral Arguments
Briefly

Oral arguments have evolved significantly over the years, with the emergence of the 'hot bench' concept and recent changes due to the Covid-19 pandemic.
The Supreme Court went from a more passive receiver of information to a hot bench, where justices actively engage with attorneys, limiting them to direct responses.
Modern oral arguments generally last an hour per case, but the Covid-19 pandemic necessitated a shift to remote formats and a more structured turn-taking system for speaking.
Historical precedent shows that oral arguments were once a platform for attorneys to elaborate their points, but this has changed to a focus on justices' direct questioning.
Read at Above the Law
[
|
]