Jury finds Meta and YouTube negligent in landmark social media addiction trial | TechCrunch

"The decision means Meta and YouTube will have to pay out $3 million in compensatory damages, with Meta bearing 70% of that cost. More damages may also be awarded, as the jury continues to deliberate further."

"The landmark case aimed to hold social media platforms accountable for their addictive products, which Kaley said contributed to her anxiety, depression, body dysmorphia, and more, in her youth."

"Evidence presented in the trial swayed the jury to the plaintiff's side, as it demonstrated that Meta understood how addictive its platforms could be among teens in particular."

"The new decision will establish a precedent that social media firms are responsible for the harms their platforms cause, whether that's their lack of safety measures or their algorithmic recommendations."

A Los Angeles jury ruled against Meta and YouTube in a case involving a young woman's mental health issues linked to social media use. The jury awarded $3 million in compensatory damages, with Meta responsible for 70% of the payout. The plaintiff, Kaley, claimed that social media contributed to her anxiety, depression, and body dysmorphia. Evidence showed that Meta was aware of the addictive nature of its platforms and targeted teens. This ruling may set a precedent for future lawsuits against social media companies for similar harms.

Read at TechCrunch