"The jury found that Anisha Mehta failed to prove that the firm was liable for discrimination under the New York City Human Rights Law. The panel also said the firm was not liable for interfering with Mehta's Family and Medical Leave Act rights and had not committed retaliation."
"DLA partner Brett Ingerman said Mehta had made numerous mistakes while at the firm, including beginning a trademark infringement action in Singapore when it was supposed to be filed in Switzerland."
"I was proud to represent the law firm I've called home for the last 32 years. DLA Piper and its lawyers are committed to fostering an environment that promotes the family journey."
A Manhattan federal jury ruled in favor of DLA Piper in a discrimination case brought by former employee Anisha Mehta, who alleged wrongful termination for taking maternity leave. The jury found that Mehta did not prove discrimination under the New York City Human Rights Law and that the firm did not interfere with her Family and Medical Leave Act rights. DLA Piper justified the termination by citing Mehta's poor work performance, despite her claims of receiving positive reviews and a bonus.
Read at Above the Law
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]