These antics by Judge James Ho and 12 conservative colleagues undermine public confidence in the judiciary by misusing their positions to boycott Columbia University graduates, conflicting with the judiciary's role as neutral arbiters.
Judicial silence on significant issues within the judiciary, such as workplace protections, ethics violations, and harsh work environments, contrasts starkly with the vocal opposition to Columbia University, revealing historic judicial hesitancy to address internal concerns.
[
add
]
[
|
|
...
]