This case presents a fundamental question at the heart of our democracy: whether a former President is absolutely immune from federal prosecution for crimes committed while in office or is constitutionally protected from federal prosecution when he has been impeached but not convicted before the criminal proceedings begin, prosecutors wrote.
Does the current carefully cultivated conservative majority on the Supreme Court possess even the slightest degree of integrity that God gave a goat? Does it recognize its duty as clearly as the Burger Court did in U.S. v. Nixon? Does it recognize that obvious fact that the former president's lawyers dreamed up this 'presidential immunity' out of the thin, foul air of Mar-a-Lago. Is its collective hive mind sharp enough to recognize an off-ramp when it sees one?
[
add
]
[
|
|
...
]