During oral arguments, Justice Alito displayed disdain for the case's established legal framework, inserting studies he hadn't presented as evidence, disregarding the judiciary's rules.
Critics have largely focused on the Supreme Court's political ideologies, but Alito's conduct reflects a deeper issue: a troubling disregard for established legal procedures.
Alito's questioning strayed far from the evidence presented, revealing a blend of personal research and ideological bias that threatens judicial integrity and established legal norms.
Collection
[
|
...
]