": A weekly roundup of just a few items from Howard Bashman's How Appealing blog, the Web's first blog devoted to appellate litigation. Check out these stories and more at How Appealing. "'Slaughter'-ing Humphrey's Executor; The Supreme Court will decide whether to overturn long-standing precedent that protects independent agencies in Trump v. Slaughter": Nick Bednar has this post at the "Lawfare" blog. "I resigned from the military because of Trump; I could not swear to follow a commander in chief who seems so willing to disregard the Constitution": Doug Krugman has this essay online at The Washington Post."
""Trump Names More Foes He Wants Prosecuted as Bondi and Patel Look On; Top officials, unwilling to fight for the independence of their institutions, watched on Wednesday as President Trump continued his pursuit of controlling law enforcement": Glenn Thrush of The New York Times has this news analysis. "SCOTUSblog's Goldstein Must Face Charges in Tax Fraud Case": Mallory Culhane of Bloomberg Law has this report on an opinion that the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland issued Tuesday. "Judicial Supremacy and American Democracy": Jonathan F. Mitchell recently had this post at the Democracy Project of NYU Law. "Trump Says He Might Attend Supreme Court Hearing on Tariffs": Lauren Dezenski and Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News have this report."
A Supreme Court docket may determine whether long-standing precedent protecting independent agencies will be overturned in Trump v. Slaughter, potentially reshaping agency independence. A former service member resigned, stating inability to swear to a commander in chief perceived as willing to disregard the Constitution. Reports describe President Trump naming additional political foes for prosecution while top officials appear reluctant to defend institutional independence. A federal court ruled that SCOTUSblog's Goldstein must face tax fraud charges. Discussion of judicial supremacy and its implications for American democracy is active, and the President may attend a Supreme Court hearing on tariffs.
Read at Above the Law
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]