"We have written to your firm three times previously seeking documents and answers regarding this corrupt bargain, and Kirkland has provided no responsive information or records in response to any of these letters. At this point, it's almost a tradition. Democrats ask questions. Kirkland & Ellis sends back a politely worded shrug. Repeat."
"The Trump administration rolled out a series of executive orders threatening law firms that represented political adversaries or maintained diversity initiatives the White House didn't like. Some firms fought. They won. The orders were struck down as unconstitutional. Others? They made deals. Kirkland was one of nine firms that opted for the let's just make this go away approach rather than litigate."
"Kirkland entered into an agreement that allegedly resolved an EEOC investigation while committing to certain pro bono work that just so happened to align with administration priorities. Kirkland's first response to Congress framed the deal as consistent with its meritocratic ideals and described the EEOC matter as resolved."
The Trump administration issued executive orders threatening law firms that represented political adversaries or maintained diversity initiatives. While some firms litigated and won, others negotiated deals. Kirkland & Ellis was among nine firms that chose settlement over litigation. The firm allegedly resolved an EEOC investigation while committing to pro bono work aligned with administration priorities. Democrats in Congress have now sent four letters requesting documents and explanations about this arrangement. Kirkland & Ellis has provided no responsive information in previous responses, prompting lawmakers to escalate their demands with increasingly firm language about what they characterize as a corrupt bargain.
#trump-administration-executive-orders #law-firm-compliance-and-deals #congressional-oversight #eeoc-investigation #diversity-initiatives
Read at Above the Law
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]