"Due to significant differences between this appeal and North American Derivatives Exchange, Inc. v. State of Nevada, No. 25-7187, the motion to reassign this appeal to the panel that heard argument in that appeal (Dkt. No. 62) is DENIED."
"The appeals court denied a request to reassign the case brought by Blue Lake Rancheria and other tribal plaintiffs against Kalshi Inc. and related defendants. The appeal is pending before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit under case number 25-7504 after originating in federal court in San Francisco."
"The California litigation has become part of a fight over whether federally regulated prediction markets can offer contracts tied to sporting events without violating state gambling laws or tribal gaming agreements."
The Ninth Circuit denied a request to reassign a Kalshi-related appeal brought by Blue Lake Rancheria and other tribal plaintiffs to the same three-judge panel that heard argument in a separate Nevada dispute. The appeal is pending under case number 25-7504 after originating in federal court in San Francisco. The court stated the motion failed because the California appeal differs substantially from North American Derivatives Exchange, Inc. v. State of Nevada, No. 25-7187. The denial order did not identify the judges assigned to the California appeal and did not provide further explanation of the legal distinctions. The broader litigation involves whether federally regulated prediction markets may offer sports-event-linked contracts without violating state gambling laws or tribal gaming agreements.
Read at ReadWrite
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]