Chief Justice Roberts was shaken by the public's adverse reaction to his decision regarding Trump, highlighting a disconnect between his rulings and public perception of the Court's legitimacy.
Erin Murphy defended Roberts by claiming the ruling was about protecting the institution of the presidency and avoiding tit-for-tat prosecutions of past presidents, yet this ruling allows a president to act with impunity.
Roman Martinez praised the ambiguity of Roberts's ruling, suggesting that the lack of clarity could ultimately lead to unforeseen consequences and leaving the interpretation open to future scrutiny.
Collection
[
|
...
]