Clarence Thomas was absent from a Supreme Court session, missing a case involving bribery payments to officials for past actions without a quid pro quo agreement. Speculation arose about his absence, potentially due to illness or involvement in a probe on financial disclosure omissions.
Rumors spread on social media, hinting at various reasons for Thomas's absence, including health issues or involvement in a financial probe regarding a judge's undisclosed financial transactions. The absence has also raised questions about potential conflicts of interest.
Speculations positioned Thomas's missing session in the context of a case involving bribery of officials for past actions. Concerns were raised about Thomas's potential conflicts of interest and the need for transparency within the Supreme Court.
Formal options for Thomas's absence were explored, such as illness or personal matters, prompting reflections on the need for disclosure and transparency in the Supreme Court's operations under the new ethics code.
[
add
]
[
|
|
...
]