"I remember the exact moment. I was refactoring a gnarly Java service - hundreds of lines of boilerplate, null checks nested three levels deep, and a for loop that made my eyes water. Then a colleague showed me the Scala equivalent. Twenty lines. Pattern matching. Immutable data structures. It was like watching someone solve a Rubik's cube in six moves while I'd been peeling off the stickers."
"For the next three years, Scala became my language of choice. Play Framework for web apps. Akka for concurrency. The elegance of map, flatMap, and fold replacing clunky imperative code. I preached the gospel of functional programming to anyone who would listen. Then, slowly, the cracks appeared. New team members took months to become productive. Code reviews turned into graduate-level seminars on category theory. And when I tried to hire Scala developers in 2018, I might as well have been searching for unicorns."
Scala combined object-oriented and functional paradigms on the JVM, promising scalability from scripts to distributed systems and access to Java's ecosystem. Concise syntax, pattern matching, immutability, and libraries like Play and Akka enabled dramatic reductions in boilerplate and expressive code using map/flatMap/fold. Early industry adoption, including Twitter, validated scalability and performance advantages. Over time, widespread adoption highlighted downsides: steep learning curve, complex abstractions, and difficult hiring, which slowed team productivity and made code reviews arcane. These practical costs eroded enthusiasm, prompting many teams to abandon Scala by around 2019 despite its technical strengths.
Read at Medium
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]