The Federal Circuit affirmed the TTAB's decision, determining that 'iVoterGuide' and 'iVoterGuide.com' are highly descriptive terms that lack the distinctiveness needed for trademark protection. The ruling dismissed Heritage Alliance's opposition to the American Policy Roundtable's applications for 'iVoters' and 'iVoters.com.' This case illuminates the complexities surrounding trademark distinctiveness, particularly regarding descriptive marks that closely reflect the services provided, emphasizing the rigorous standards that must be met for such terms to receive trademark protection.
In the case of Heritage Alliance, the Federal Circuit upheld the TTAB's decision, stating that the terms 'iVoterGuide' and 'iVoterGuide.com' were deemed highly descriptive and did not achieve distinctiveness.
The court's ruling reaffirms the importance of establishing distinctiveness in trademark applications, highlighting the challenges that descriptive terms face in achieving trademark protection.
Collection
[
|
...
]