"Evidence of commercial success, copying, industry praise, long-felt need, and licensing can, when properly connected to the claimed invention, overcome even a strong prima facie case of obviousness."
"The Board found all challenged claims unpatentable as obvious, emphasizing the need for a clear nexus between objective indicia evidence and the claimed invention."
"The patented system uses a 'constricted convection plate' placed behind the display to create a narrow channel through which cool air flows directly across the hot posterior surface."
"MRI had marshaled extensive objective indicia evidence, including long-felt need for effective outdoor display cooling and Samsung's own failed attempts to solve the problem."
Patent owners rely on objective indicia of nonobviousness, such as commercial success and industry praise, to counter obviousness claims. In a recent case, the Federal Circuit upheld the PTAB's decision to cancel MRI's patents for cooling systems, citing a lack of established nexus between the evidence and the claimed invention. The patents aimed to improve cooling for outdoor electronic displays using a unique method. Despite presenting extensive evidence, MRI could not overcome the prima facie case of obviousness established by Samsung's petition.
Read at Patently-O
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]