"The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit determined that the PTAB improperly construed a limitation of one independent claim but correctly construed limitations of other independent claims."
"Tesla petitioned for inter partes review of several claims of the '135 patent, arguing that the claims would have been obvious in light of a Japanese patent application known as Hibi."
"The Federal Circuit agreed with Tesla, finding that the claim does not require the climate control mechanism to take the battery charge level into account."
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reviewed Tesla's appeal against Charge Fusion Technologies' patent on an electric charging system. The court found that the PTAB misinterpreted a limitation of one claim but correctly interpreted others. It reversed the non-obviousness finding for claim 1, vacated the judgment on dependent claims, and upheld the non-obviousness of remaining claims. The patent allows for climate control in parked vehicles to maintain temperature for pets while charging.
Read at IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Intellectual Property Law
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]