Raw Story v. OpenAI: The Constitutional Hurdle That Tripped Up Raw Story's AI Lawsuit
Briefly

The plaintiffs argued that since ChatGPT outputs responses based on training from various articles, it should retain the CMI of those sources, which they claim was intentionally removed.
Judge McMahon dismissed the claims against OpenAI, stating the plaintiffs did not demonstrate the necessary Article III standing, a fundamental aspect of judicial power concerning who can actually litigate.
Read at Patently-O
[
|
]