The article discusses the legal dispute between YETI and RTIC, focusing on trade dress as a means of protecting brand identity. While patents protect functionality, trade dress safeguards the visual design of products, helping to prevent consumer confusion. The court's ruling in a similar cosmetics case illustrated that distinct branding and clear market separation can mitigate claims of infringement. YETI's litigation against RTIC underscores the importance of trade dress in maintaining market presence and identity, emphasizing the need for clarity, evidence, and strategic application in legal protections.
Trade dress refers to the visual appearance of a product or its packaging - shape, color, texture, and overall look - that signals the product's origin to consumers.
The litigation between YETI and RTIC shows how trade dress can be a strategic tool to protect brand identity and market share when pursued with precision.
Collection
[
|
...
]