The NIH's proposed cap on indirect research funding sparked widespread opposition from academic entities, prompting multiple lawsuits. The initiative aimed to direct more funds toward direct research costs but faced criticism for potentially leading to increased tuition and reduced research capabilities. Judge Angel Kelley's rulings condemned the policy as reckless and legally flawed for lacking proper procedural adherence. Her permanent injunctions paved the way for the NIH to appeal, indicating ongoing legal battles surrounding research funding and its implications on academic institutions and medical innovation.
The NIH's plan to cap indirect research costs at 15% faced lawsuits from universities, claiming it would jeopardize medical research and increase tuition costs.
Judge Kelley ruled the NIH's cap on indirect costs as reckless, emphasizing it violated law and bypassed proper rule-making protocols.
Collection
[
|
...
]