The recent legal landscape is marked by significant developments, including Rod Rosenstein's shift to Baker McKenzie, a firm now under scrutiny due to Trump's executive orders. Meanwhile, the ongoing disbarment process for John Eastman raises critical questions regarding accountability in political law practices. Firms like Cadwalader are seeing key partners depart for competitive firms pursuing litigation against Trump, indicating a trend of reassessment among legal professionals. Additionally, the Supreme Court's refusal to revisit a copyright suit against Ed Sheeran demonstrates the complexities of intellectual property law in contemporary music.
Rod Rosenstein's new appointment at Baker McKenzie positions the firm strategically within the jurisdiction of Trump's recent executive orders, which may have significant implications for legal practices involved with the former administration.
John Eastman, the legal architect behind the effort to overturn the 2020 election, faces potential disbarment, which raises important questions about accountability within legal circles, particularly how political stances affect legal ethics.
With key partners leaving Cadwalader to firms opposing Trump, this could signal a shift in the legal landscape post-election, making firms reassess their political affiliations and clients.
The Supreme Court’s decision not to review the copyright dispute over Ed Sheeran's 'Thinking Out Loud' highlights the high bar set for demonstrating copyright infringement, particularly in the realm of popular music.
Collection
[
|
...
]