Meta achieved a significant legal victory when a federal judge ruled that the company did not infringe copyright by utilizing works from 13 authors, including notable figures like Sarah Silverman, to train its AI tools. The judge, Vince Chhabria, determined the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate that this practice harmed them financially. This ruling may influence other ongoing AI copyright lawsuits and suggests a complex legal landscape regarding AI training and copyright. However, Chhabria acknowledged that his decision is confined to this particular case, allowing for future lawsuits.
"The Court has no choice but to grant summary judgment to Meta on the plaintiffs' claim that the company violated copyright law by training its models with their books."
"Chhabria had previously stressed that he planned to look carefully at whether the plaintiffs had enough evidence to show that Meta's use of their work would hurt them financially."
Collection
[
|
...
]