"Gamevice's response emphasizes that Nintendo's motion to vacate lacks a legal foundation, asserting that the procedural improprieties in the Federal Circuit's remand could be grounds for an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court."
"The Federal Circuit's ruling confirmed that the Nintendo Switch does not infringe Gamevice's patents, citing the design's use of rubber actuators and pins instead of the claimed 'apertures' for securing buttons and joysticks."
"Gamevice's filing points out the conflict between the Federal Circuit's noninfringement ruling and the district court's earlier invalidity finding, which stated that the Nintendo Switch anticipated Gamevice's patent claims."
Gamevice filed a response to Nintendo's motion to vacate parts of a judgment that invalidated its patent claims regarding handheld computing accessories. Gamevice welcomed the vacatur of adverse rulings but highlighted procedural issues from the Federal Circuit's remand, which may lead to an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Federal Circuit affirmed a noninfringement ruling based on the Nintendo Switch's design, which conflicted with a prior invalidity finding. Gamevice argues that Nintendo lacks a legal basis for modifying the previous judgment.
Read at IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Intellectual Property Law
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]