The recent Federal Circuit decision in Bullshine Distillery LLC v. Sazerac Brands, LLC addressed the genericness of trademark terms. Bullshine sought to register "BULLSHINE FIREBULL" for alcoholic beverages while Sazerac opposed it, claiming the term "FIREBALL" might cause confusion. The case raised the question of whether terms that have been considered generic are permanently unregistrable. The Federal Circuit affirmed the lower board's assessment, establishing that a term's generic nature can change over time based on consumer perception at the point of trademark application. This ruling clarifies a key aspect of trademark law regarding genericness and registration.
In this ruling, the Federal Circuit clarified that generic terms are not permanently unregistrable, emphasizing that the timing of genericness is critical for trademark registration.
Bullshine Distillery's case highlights that even previously generic terms can achieve trademark registration if consumer perceptions change over time, thus rejecting the idea that terms stay generic indefinitely.
The Federal Circuit determined that the relevant question for trademark registration is not whether a term was ever generic, but rather consumer understanding at the time of application.
The decision underscores the evolving nature of trademark law, reiterating that genericness is context-dependent and must be assessed at the time of registration, not retrospectively.
Collection
[
|
...
]