In recent nonprecedential decisions, the Federal Circuit confirmed that BillJCo's patents are unpatentable due to obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The outcomes shed light on the court's firm stance regarding secondary considerations of non-obviousness, suggesting a consistent trend that could impact future patent disputes. Moreover, the opinions exemplify the Federal Circuit's approach to claim construction, particularly its tendency to interpret claim terms to incorporate negative limitations. This highlights the importance of detailed specifications in patent claims and the implications for patent holders seeking protection.
The Federal Circuit's stark reaffirmation of PTAB's finding of obviousness reflects its stringent stance on secondary considerations, which may prove significant for future patent litigations.
In these inter partes reviews, the court's interpretation of claim terms reiterate its commitment to precise claim construction, emphasizing the inclusion of negative limitations.
Collection
[
|
...
]