"Advocates at the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) argue that the proposed legislation could empower manufacturers to introduce restrictive policies affecting consumer choice, leading to widespread surveillance of users' printing activity."
"The primary goal of AB 2047 is to require 3D printer manufacturers to use a state-certified algorithm that checks digital design files for firearm components and blocks print jobs that would produce prohibited parts."
"Cliff Braun and Rory Mir from the EFF claim that the proposals in California are technically infeasible and will lead to consumer surveillance, arguing that print-blocking technology cannot work for a range of technical reasons."
California's proposed AB 2047 legislation aims to require 3D printer manufacturers to block the printing of firearm components. Digital rights activists warn that this could lead to consumer surveillance and restrict open-source tools. The Electronic Frontier Foundation argues that the legislation may empower manufacturers to impose restrictive policies, potentially resulting in copyright lawsuits if user data is shared. Critics claim the technology to enforce such restrictions is technically infeasible and could infringe on consumer rights, raising concerns about the balance between regulation and personal freedom.
Read at Theregister
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]