CAFC Says Patent Applicant Failed to Timely Preserve Appointments Clause Challenge to Examiner Rejection
Briefly

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld the Eastern District of Virginia's dismissal of Odyssey Logistics' Appointments Clause challenge regarding a patent application for online freight management systems. The court ruled that Odyssey's objection came too late, following the Supreme Court's Arthrex decision. The dismissal emphasized the necessity for timely preservation of legal challenges. Despite the Federal Circuit's slightly altered reasoning, the outcome confirmed that Odyssey Logistics failed to address the relevant changes in law regarding its patent application dispute promptly.
"The Federal Circuit found no abuse of discretion in Eastern Virginia's dismissal, adding that the appellate court's own decisions post-Arthrex have recognized that Appointments Clause challenges must be timely preserved."
"Although the Federal Circuit affirmed the dismissal on slightly different grounds, the appellate court found that the patent applicant did not respond to any change of law under Arthrex with the timeliness required to obtain any potential relief from the USPTO's rejection of its patent application."
Read at IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Intellectual Property Law
[
|
]