"Asking whether distress is genuine enough to warrant action traps us in an adversarial, unproductive debate over the validity of students' emotional experiences."
"The better question is whether the only response available to them is to shut themselves or others down-an approach that denies students' agency and resilience."
"Faculty responses to students' concerns about engaging with material they find disturbing often fall into two camps."
"Those in the first camp assert that students lack resilience as a result of being coddled their entire lives and so have a tendency to frame everyday struggles as catastrophic or traumatic."
University campuses are struggling to foster meaningful engagement among students across differences, as many students increasingly frame their experiences as traumatic. This perception leads to refusals to engage in dialogue or attempts to shut down discussions. Incidents arise where students opt out of academic conversations they find harmful, prompting educators to reconsider their responses. Instead of questioning the validity of students' distress, a focus on promoting an agentic mindset is suggested, encouraging resilience and acknowledging discomfort while expanding available responses.
Read at Inside Higher Ed | Higher Education News, Events and Jobs
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]