Management experts say DOGE is a case study in bad management
Briefly

Donald Trump's reelection presented Republicans with an opportunity to reduce bureaucracy, spearheaded by Elon Musk's leadership of the newly formed Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Initially, experts were optimistic, believing Musk's experience could lead to effective waste reduction. However, six weeks into DOGE's operations, significant concerns emerged regarding the effectiveness of Musk's methods, which were deemed clumsy and counterproductive. Although some changes mirrored Musk's aggressive business strategies, they resulted in chaos and uncertainty within governmental structures, leading experts to reevaluate their initial confidence in the initiative.
Experts initially viewed Musk's appointment as a chance for creative destruction to improve government efficiency, but now raise concerns about clumsy tactics and consequences.
Many believed that with Musk at the helm, the moment had arrived to realize Republicans' dream of slashing bureaucracy and improving government efficiency.
The plan seemed solid at first: Musk's past successes at companies suggested he could tackle Washington waste, yet the reality has led to serious unease.
While his strategy was viewed as potentially transformative, the experts expressed growing worry that DOGE's approach was mismanaged and counterproductive.
Read at Business Insider
[
|
]