"From the start, Nothing was designed to be an antidote to Apple and its omnipresent AirPods. While Apple focused on a sort of all-purpose minimalism, Nothing adopted a hallmark transparent look that, if not altogether disparate (both pairs of wireless earbuds have a similar stem design), at least gave its Ear products a unique design language. That quest for being different extended into features, too. In 2023, Nothing introduced personalized EQ, giving it a visual and technological difference over Apple's AirPods"
"But a lot happens in a few years, especially in a space as saturated as wireless earbuds, and while Nothing's Ear are still a solid pair of earbuds, they feel a little less of an earful. Apple now has its AirPods Pro 3 with high-tech features like real-time translation and heart rate monitoring, while non-Apple competitors in the same price range, like OnePlus and Google, aren't pulling any punches with their own entrants into the space that offer personalized EQ, AI features"
"But just in the nick of time, as Nothing's flagship wireless earbuds seem to be falling behind, the company is back with its $180 Ear 3 that offer a new look and one truly unique feature for improving voice calls. As usual, Nothing is taking some chances, and not just in the visual department. For me, some of those risks are really paying off, but others well, they're not so super."
Nothing emphasizes a transparent design language and differentiated features such as personalized EQ and earlier ChatGPT integration to stand apart from AirPods. The wireless-earbud market has rapidly advanced, with AirPods Pro 3 adding real-time translation and heart-rate monitoring and rivals from OnePlus and Google offering personalized EQ, AI features, and strong noise cancellation. The $180 Ear 3 refresh provides a refreshed aesthetic, solid audio performance, and effective ANC plus a novel Super Mic aimed at improving calls. Sound quality and build feel like strengths. The Super Mic underperforms, and the upgrade may not justify the premium over the prior generation.
Read at gizmodo.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]