"You know why NATO should care about this? It was just a couple of weeks ago that we learned that Iran has ballistic missile capabilities that can reach most of Europe."
"We have U.S. troops stationed at all these bases, with all these allies, and then when we decide that we need to do something that is in our national security interest, you have supposed friends of the United States saying, You can't use these bases."
"But Scott, should they have been consulted? Consulted? asked Jennings, before shrugging. I mean, look, we decided it was in our national security interest."
"If this war is about Europe's security, shouldn't Europe be consulted? It's about our national security, but along the way here, what we've all learned..."
Scott Jennings expressed frustration over NATO allies not supporting U.S. military actions despite the threat posed by Iran's ballistic missiles. He emphasized the importance of U.S. national security interests and questioned why allies do not recognize the shared threat. Abby Phillip countered by arguing that NATO and European countries should have a say in military decisions affecting their security. The debate highlighted tensions between U.S. interests and the need for consultation with allies regarding military actions.
Read at www.mediaite.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]