The International Court of Justice ruled that nations have a legal duty to prevent environmental harm and limit greenhouse gas emissions. This ruling indicates that failing to uphold this duty could be considered an 'internationally wrongful act,' allowing affected countries to seek reparations. Although nonbinding, the ruling exerts pressure on industrialized nations and encourages climate litigation globally. The court acknowledged the dangers of climate change, underscoring the need for significant political will and emphasizing the ruling's potential as a course-correction in climate action efforts.
Judge Yuji Iwasawa painted a sweeping picture of the dangers of climate change, saying it crosses borders and 'imperils all forms of life.'
Any breach of the duty to prevent environmental harm represents an 'internationally wrongful act' and can lead to reparations for suffering countries.
The ruling is nonbinding but increases pressure on industrialized countries to fulfill their climate pledges and opens the door to more climate cases globally.
It's a very important course-correction,' Vanuatu's climate envoy said, expressing hope for a turning point following the court's decision.
#international-law #climate-change #environmental-protection #greenhouse-gas-emissions #judicial-ruling
Collection
[
|
...
]