The VAR Review: Was Havertz 'choke?' Plus Everton's penalty and Eze's 'no goal'
Briefly

Yerson Mosquera's incident with Kai Havertz raised questions about VAR's role, highlighting the complexities of interpreting 'violent conduct' and situational context during decisions.
The VAR review process involves nuanced considerations, such as player intent and situational context, making it challenging to determine whether actions warrant penalties or red cards.
In keeping with VAR protocols, the decision-making process hinges on whether the referee missed a clear error rather than strictly assessing if an act qualifies as a foul.
The overturning of Everton's penalty against Brighton showcases how subjective interpretations can significantly impact outcomes in Premier League matches.
Read at ESPN.com
[
]
[
|
]