The lead plaintiffs argue that the rejection of their request for vegan options infringes on their rights to freedom of conscience and personal identity, highlighting the importance of dietary choices in defining one's identity.
The students claim that a lack of plant-based options in the dining hall compromises their health and sustenance and stresses the need for ethical food choices to be recognized.
The university defends its stance, citing budget limitations and labeling the lawsuit as "absurd", yet the students emphasize that the issue is more about equality and non-discrimination than financial constraints.
The lawsuit urges for a restructuring of the dining options to create an inclusive environment that respects the dietary needs of all students, particularly those who are vegan.
Collection
[
|
...
]