The panel concluded that Osman Barkat had displayed unacceptable behavior, indicating a significant lack of control over his anger, which he should have managed better.
Witnesses observed Barkat's aggressive outbursts in class. There was a series of incidents where he struggled with temper, raising valid concerns about his behavior.
In his defense, Barkat claimed he aimed for the table, not the student, acknowledging his actions were unacceptable but denying intent to harm.
The misconduct panel highlighted the serious implications of Barkat's actions, stressing that as a teacher, he should have adhered strictly to de-escalation principles learned in training.
Collection
[
|
...
]