The location of the collision "constituted a dangerous condition of public property," leading to a multimillion-dollar settlement after the city's failure to adhere to safety standards.
Carter Zinn emphasized that Oakland "violated longstanding Caltrans design safety standards by failing to paint the curb red for about 100 [feet], the minimum distance required."
The family's legal argument highlighted several factors, such as speeding cars, poor lighting, and a history of collisions, suggesting that the city was aware of dangers at the intersection.
Despite Oakland's strong legal immunity, the unique circumstances and evidence of poor road design made it necessary for the city to settle without admitting liability.
Collection
[
|
...
]