Sarah Isgur’s curling analogy illustrates that while campaign teams attempt to influence elections through strategies, much of the outcome is determined by larger, uncontrollable forces like the economy.
In curling, the sweepers play a vital role, but they cannot control the momentum of the rock. Similarly, candidates can attempt to guide voters, but external factors will heavily influence the election's outcome.
Political commentators often focus on the tactics employed in campaigns rather than the broader dynamics at play. Yet, it's clear that the 'stone' of political reality is what truly dictates election results.
The dynamics of an election, akin to the weight and speed of a curling stone, are often beyond the control of individual candidates and their teams.
Collection
[
|
...
]