Jack Goldsmith emphasizes that while the immunity aspect of the Supreme Court ruling may not alter executive branch practices significantly, it does provide a framework that broadly defines presidential power. This conceptual expansion of executive authority could lead to more aggressive uses of that power under a second Trump administration, which directly impacts the advice legal counsel provides to the president.
Kate Shaw notes that an upcoming Trump administration is expected to produce a plethora of initiatives early on, covering diverse areas like immigration and environmental regulation. She expresses concern about the legal implications and challenges that these initiatives may face, particularly given the constitutionality of unprecedented actions that could emerge in light of the legal landscape defined by previous court rulings.
Collection
[
|
...
]