Jane C. Ginsburg, intellectual property expert: We are not ready to accept the idea of the machine being the author'

The issue reached all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, which decided that even though a machine was involved in the creation of the work, the work showed the ideas in the mind of the author that are given visible expression.

AI has made copyright lawyers think back to basic principles, raising questions about who should be considered the author when AI generates new content.

The idea of who takes the picture cannot be limited to simply pressing the button, as demonstrated in the case where the photographer did not physically press the button but set up everything.

Read at english.elpais.com