Saylor's remarks about trusting Bitcoin in state custody over self-custody ignited fierce backlash, prompting accusations and stirred debates on public markets and adoption strategies.
Despite anger, Saylor's comments present an interesting viewpoint that questions the traditional self-custody narrative, suggesting a shift towards state involvement for broader Bitcoin adoption.
The reaction from the Bitcoin community illustrates a divide on self-custody, highlighting deep-seated beliefs while Saylor attempts to illuminate potential paths for Bitcoin's future.
Saylor’s idea reframes Bitcoin discussions by positioning public custody as a viable option, potentially impacting adoption strategies and how Bitcoin is perceived in mainstream finance.
Collection
[
|
...
]