Players Propose Pay Increases, Owners Counter with Hard Salary Cap -
Briefly

Players Propose Pay Increases, Owners Counter with Hard Salary Cap -
The MLB Players Association and the league are exchanging collective bargaining proposals ahead of the December 1 expiration. The union’s first proposal includes raising the competitive balance tax threshold to $300 million, increasing the minimum salary to $1.5 million, and adding a competitive-integrity tax on teams spending under $150 million. It also proposes free agency for players aged 30 or older with at least five years of service, plus a mechanism allowing teams to retain such players for a sixth season by offering an average based on the top 125 salaries. Additional proposals include increasing the pre-arbitration bonus pool to $180 million and doubling Super 2 arbitration players, alongside revenue sharing changes that let teams keep more stadium revenue.
"The union made its first proposal to the league on Wednesday, with points that included: Increasing the competitive balance tax threshold to $300 million Raising the minimum salary to $1.5 million, nearly double the current rate Imposing a "competitive-integrity tax" on teams that spend less than $150 million Free agency for players who are 30 years old with 5+ years of service time Changes to revenue sharing that would see teams keep more of their stadium revenues Increasing the pre-arbitration bonus pool from $50 million to $180 million Doubling the number of Super 2 arbitration players"
"I want to point out the free agency wrinkle in particular, as reducing the service time by a full year isn't something owners would embrace. But by adding in the provision that players must also be 30 years old, the union is mainly looking out for those players who didn't come into their own until their mid-20s. Also in the proposal is a mechanism for teams to keep those players for a sixth season by offering the average of the top 125 salaries in the league. It's kind of like a hybrid of the qualifying offer and the NFL's franchise tag."
"On the whole, this series of proposals seems very reasonable and is aimed at getting more money to players while also encouraging small- and mid-market teams to spend more of their revenue-sharing proceeds on player payroll."
Read at Cubsinsider
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]