Leicester's decision to sack Steve Cooper was unexpected, but the club's hierarchy felt there was a need for change due to a disappointing league performance. Despite the team's potential, they were only a point above the relegation zone, raising fears about their survival in the Premier League. Cooper's positive mindset about his influence on the squad clashed with the urgent need for results, leading to growing concerns about his tactical adaptation and the disconnect with players.
The players were still adapting to Cooper’s coaching after having been schooled by Maresca’s very different approach, creating a challenge in aligning with Cooper's less expansive style. The 44-year-old made efforts to adjust his coaching philosophy as he aimed for effective performances on the pitch, yet overall results continued to fall short. There was an understanding of the differing styles, but the club recognized that such transitions take time, and the uncertainty around survival pushed management's hand.
While Leicester's ambitions have shifted since their iconic 2016 title win, Cooper's willingness to adapt his beliefs for team survival drew partial praise. However, fans and management alike felt that simply scoring goals—something the team has done consistently—could not mask deeper issues. Maintaining a sustainable Premier League presence requires a solidified tactical execution and harmonious connections within the squad, which appeared to be lacking, resulting in an uneasy atmosphere that reflected in their positions on the table.
Collection
[
|
...
]