Are you paying a 'ghost tax' when looking for a job? 37% of employment seekers fall into this common trap
Briefly

Are you paying a 'ghost tax' when looking for a job? 37% of employment seekers fall into this common trap
""When job seekers are losing actual money to engage with a company's brand, we aren't just looking at an HR problem, we're looking at a systemic breakdown of the professional social contract.""
""We are moving toward a low-trust economy where the friction of finding talent will eventually cost more than the 'free' data companies are currently trying to extract.""
""Nearly half, or 47% of candidates have applied for roles they later discovered were non-existent, indicating the tactic is a common strategy now among mainstream corporations.""
""Technology and marketing have highest number of these deceptive listings, with 85.7% of tech workers and 87.5% of marketing professionals reporting ghost jobs.""
The American job market is increasingly filled with ghost jobs, which are listings for positions that do not exist. A study by Enhancv found that 37% of job seekers incur direct expenses, termed 'ghost tax', while pursuing these phantom listings. Companies post these jobs to gather competitive intelligence and create an illusion of growth. Nearly half of candidates have applied for non-existent roles, with technology and marketing sectors being the most affected. Red flags include reposted jobs after automatic rejections, leading to frustration among job seekers.
Read at Fast Company
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]