Meta is discontinuing its fact-checking initiative in the U.S. in favor of a community feedback model, allowing users to flag potentially misleading posts.
Experts, like everyone else, have their own biases and perspectives. This showed up in the choices some made about what to fact check and how.
The recent elections also feel like a cultural tipping point towards once again prioritizing speech. This change caters to user frustrations with previous content management.
We've seen this approach work on X, where they empower their community to decide when posts are potentially misleading and need more context.
Collection
[
|
...
]